letters

Submitted by netipr on Fri, 02/01/2019 - 06:04
Manus Island RPC
Discussion Live Update (14th March 2021 )

Discussion on Detention Slavery
Facebook Outreach
Public Outreach on the Facebook

Slavery: International Convention and Statutes

Campaign Letters:

Legal Resources

Case Notes, Examples and Discussion on the legal definition of slavery

Case examples and the Discussion on the slavery

Common Responses on Offshore Slavery by
the General Public and this Author's Replies


IN-REPLY>> This is not a 'fake news'. It is statement of my personal observation of the Government of Australia commissioning of enslavement crime since 2014. Detail report here. http://www.aus4iccwitness.org/node/48


IN-REPLY>> My dear Marj Meers. The thing I am talking here is about "crime & justice". The LNP Government had enslaved these asylum-seekers -- which you said are not good people -- for 4.5 years. The government had colluded in making money for the detention companies, such as Broadspectrum (entirely Australian owned by the way). The Government committing of this enslavement crime has been proven. By Law, the government or any organisation or any person "MUST NOT ENSLAVE" any other "HUMAN BEING", whether that "HUMAN BEING" is good or bad persons. HYPOTHETICALLY: let's me put a parable in this way. Say (LET SAY), Australia had some "convicted criminals" placed in Nauru for detention. Lets say, the detention company had asked the government to extend these criminals' sentence so that the company would make more money. Would that be fair thing to do? Would that be allowed ? I would say that will be a case of "slavery (enslavement)". Here now, these asylum-seekers, "HUMAN BEINGS" by the way, are convicted of no crimes; our government has been detaining them year after year and the detention companies are making billions after billions for every year. Why not the government resolving these detention cases sooner, or just send to New Zealand for example. Just think about it. Justice must be served by all. Cheers.


>>IN-REPLY:>> My dear Russell Follett. About 80% of those on Manus & Nauru are 'recognized' refugees. Within them, a numbers of those are 'stateless persons'. Refugee, by definition, cannot be forced or practically unable to return to their country. For stateless persons, return to their countries isn't even 'theoretically' possible. Look at the cases of Salim Kyaw Ning and Feriboz Kirimi, who both died last year on Manus Island and Nauru. They are stateless people from Myanmar and Iran. The statement of these people cannot be 'returned back to their own country' is "real". And the statement of our government enslaving them is not a "political rhetoric". The crime of enslavement is "real" and perpetrators must face justice. Cheers. NetIPR. http://www.aus4iccwitness.org/node/57

Jacinda Ardern


IN REPLY: >>When you said "real refugee goes to the nearest safe country", you seemed to have a different definition of "real refugee" (bona-fide, genuine refugee) than Australian Immigration and Australian Government. The Australian Government had properly considered, and processed and the claims being accepted for "refugees" who have arrived by even forged-passports and by aeroplanes, from far away countries :-) :-) What can you say to that ?? When you think about the 700,000 Rohingya/Bengali refugees in Bangladesh, what you said would seems making sense. But, in this world, not all refugee situation are like this. For some Australians, the refugee who would never come to Australia is only "good, bona-fide & genuine refugee"; for they are sugarcoating their own lie, inconsistency and shortcomings, so as to be able to swallowed by themselves, and in turn, blaming those now detained refugees on offshore as "illegal, queue jumpers, country shoppers, rich-lifestyle seeking, buy expensive trip from human smugglers". In truth, a refugee is just a person who needs protection, safety and security; nothing more, nothing less. -- Cheers, NetIPR.

IN-REPLY:>> What I am telling is Australian government, or anybody else, has 'no rights' to exploit any other human being as "slave". Whether that "enslaved" person is a "crook" or "criminal" or "illegal queue jumpers" or "prostitutes of bad characters" or "suffering from leprosy or HIV/AIDS" or "crippled and disabled". It is "irrelevant" point to it now, whether these "people" are refugees or non-refugees, nobody has the "right" to exploit another human beings in this way. When our government deprive the asylum-seekers personal liberties, whilst making ways for detention companies to make billions of money, that become the act of crime: CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY. You might like to have a look at the High Court Case of "Queen vs. Tang", where a brothel owner in Melbourne had 'exploited" the 'alien prostitute/sex-workers" as "slaves" in few years back. What we are seeing, in comparison with our government action now, is the kind of "exploitation" of "legally defenseless" and "vulnerable" human being as "slaves". Cheers. NetIPR.